fbpx

How Hospital Blood Tests Can Make or Break Your DUI Case




Introduction to Hospital Blood Tests in DUI Cases

Hospital blood tests play a crucial role in DUI prosecutions. Understanding how these tests are conducted and their implications can significantly impact the outcome of your DUI case. This section will provide an overview of hospital blood tests in DUI cases, including their purpose and the legal context in which they are used.

The Role of Hospital Blood Tests in DUI Prosecutions

Hospital blood tests are often used to determine the blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of individuals involved in DUI incidents. These tests are typically conducted for medical purposes but can later be used as evidence in DUI prosecutions. The results of these tests can either support or undermine the prosecution’s case, depending on various factors such as the accuracy of the test and the procedures followed during the blood draw.

In Florida, authorities might seek a search warrant to seize the vials of medical blood from the hospital in felony DUI cases or subpoena the medical records showing a notation about the BAC level in misdemeanor cases. This process involves several legal steps and can significantly affect the admissibility of the evidence.

Can hospital blood tests be used in DUI prosecutions? The short answer is “maybe.” The use of hospital blood tests in DUI cases depends on various legal and procedural factors.

For instance, in some cases, the investigating officer will immediately get a warrant before coming into the hospital to seize the blood sample taken by the medical professional. Although in Florida, the use of a subpoena for that purpose is relatively rare. If a subpoena was used to take your blood sample given for medical purposes, your attorney can file a motion to suppress the evidence on the grounds that no probable cause supported the issuance of the warrant or demand a Franks hearing to suppress evidence gained from the search warrant because of false statements or omission in the affidavit.

Even if the investigating officer got a warrant to seize the vials of blood or serum from the hospital, an additional court order is usually required before the sample can be sent to the crime lab for analysis. This additional step ensures that the evidence is handled correctly and maintains its integrity for use in court.

The more common situation arises when the prosecutor seeks a subpoena to obtain the notation in the medical records showing the BAC level. If the prosecutor gets the medical records, they can attempt to use those records against the defendant in a criminal prosecution for DUI-related crimes. Before the prosecutor can get the records through a subpoena, they must provide the patient with written notice of their intention to issue the subpoena at the patient’s last known address.

That notice can be issued either before or after an arrest is made. If you received such a notice, your criminal defense attorney can object to the subpoena being issued, which then triggers the so-called “Hunter Hearing.”

During the Hunter Hearing, your attorney can argue all of the reasons that a subpoena for the blood test results should not be issued. Even if the prosecutor gets the records, your attorney can fight to keep those records out of evidence at trial.

Understanding the role of hospital blood tests in DUI prosecutions can help you better navigate your case. Knowing the legal context and potential challenges can make a significant difference in the outcome of your DUI case. For more information on how hospital blood tests can impact your DUI case, you can explore our Comprehensive DUI Blood Test Guide and other related resources.

Legal Documents and Courthouse

Challenging the admissibility and accuracy of hospital blood test results is a common defense strategy in DUI cases. This section will explore the legal challenges that can be raised against hospital blood tests, including issues related to consent, chain of custody, and the reliability of the test results.

One of the primary legal challenges to hospital blood tests in DUI cases is the issue of consent. In Florida, law enforcement officers typically need a warrant or the individual’s consent to obtain a blood sample. If the blood was drawn without proper consent or a valid warrant, the results might be inadmissible in court. Additionally, the chain of custody must be meticulously documented to ensure the integrity of the sample.

Can hospital blood tests be used in DUI prosecutions? The short answer is “maybe.” The use of hospital blood tests in DUI cases depends on various legal and procedural factors.

In some instances, the investigating officer will immediately obtain a warrant before seizing the blood sample taken by the medical professional. However, in Florida, the use of a subpoena for this purpose is relatively rare. If a subpoena was used to take your blood sample given for medical purposes, your attorney can file a motion to suppress the evidence on the grounds that no probable cause supported the issuance of the warrant or demand a Franks hearing to suppress evidence gained from the search warrant due to false statements or omissions in the affidavit.

Even if the investigating officer obtained a warrant to seize the vials of blood or serum from the hospital, an additional court order is usually required before the sample can be sent to the crime lab for analysis. This additional step ensures that the evidence is handled correctly and maintains its integrity for use in court.

The more common situation arises when the prosecutor seeks a subpoena to obtain the notation in the medical records showing the BAC level. If the prosecutor gets the medical records, they can attempt to use those records against the defendant in a criminal prosecution for DUI-related crimes. Before the prosecutor can get the records through a subpoena, they must provide the patient with written notice of their intention to issue the subpoena at the patient’s last known address.

That notice can be issued either before or after an arrest is made. If you received such a notice, your criminal defense attorney can object to the subpoena being issued, which then triggers the so-called “Hunter Hearing.”

Chain of Custody Issues

Another critical aspect of challenging hospital blood tests in DUI cases is the chain of custody. The chain of custody refers to the documentation that tracks the handling, storage, and transfer of the blood sample from the moment it is collected until it is presented in court. Any break or inconsistency in the chain of custody can lead to questions about the sample’s integrity and reliability.

For example, if the blood sample was not stored properly or if there were gaps in the documentation, it could be argued that the sample may have been tampered with or contaminated. This can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case and potentially lead to the exclusion of the blood test results as evidence.

The chain of custody must include:

  • Documentation of each person who handled the sample: This includes medical staff, law enforcement officers, and lab technicians.
  • Details of how the sample was stored: Proper storage conditions must be maintained to prevent degradation or contamination.
  • Records of any transfers of the sample: Each transfer must be documented to ensure the sample’s integrity.

Ensuring a proper chain of custody is crucial for the admissibility of hospital blood test results in DUI cases. Any discrepancies can be used to challenge the validity of the evidence.

Reliability of Test Results

The reliability of hospital blood test results can also be challenged based on the methods used for testing and the conditions under which the tests were conducted. Hospital blood tests are typically performed for medical purposes, not forensic analysis, which can lead to questions about their accuracy and reliability in a legal context.

Common issues that can affect the reliability of hospital blood test results include:

  • Contamination: Contamination can occur during the collection, handling, or testing of the blood sample. Proper protocols must be followed to prevent contamination.
  • Improper storage: Blood samples must be stored at specific temperatures and conditions to maintain their integrity. Any deviation from these conditions can affect the test results.
  • Use of serum instead of whole blood: Hospital blood tests often use serum rather than whole blood, which can result in higher BAC readings. This discrepancy can be used to challenge the accuracy of the test results.

What is the difference between serum and whole blood tests? Serum tests are performed on the liquid portion of a drawn blood sample after the solid cellular components have been removed, while whole blood tests are performed on blood that has not been broken down into solid and liquid components.

Understanding these scientific nuances is crucial for challenging the validity of the test results. For more information on how to challenge blood test results, you can explore our guide on winning a blood test DUI.

In conclusion, challenging the admissibility and accuracy of hospital blood test results in DUI cases involves addressing issues related to consent, chain of custody, and the reliability of the test results. By understanding these legal challenges, you can better navigate your DUI case and protect your rights. For more detailed information on the legal and scientific aspects of hospital blood tests in DUI cases, visit our Comprehensive DUI Blood Test Guide.

Scientific and Procedural Issues with Hospital Blood Tests

Hospital blood tests are not infallible and can be subject to various scientific and procedural issues. This section will delve into the common problems associated with hospital blood tests, such as contamination, improper storage, and the differences between serum and whole blood tests.

Contamination and Storage Issues

Contamination and improper storage of blood samples can significantly affect the accuracy of hospital blood test results. Blood samples must be handled and stored correctly to prevent degradation or contamination. Additionally, hospital blood tests often use serum rather than whole blood, which can result in higher BAC readings. Understanding these scientific nuances is crucial for challenging the validity of the test results.

What is contamination in blood tests? Contamination refers to the introduction of impurities or foreign substances into the blood sample, which can lead to inaccurate results.

Proper storage conditions are vital to maintaining the integrity of blood samples. Blood samples should be stored at specific temperatures and conditions to prevent degradation. Any deviation from these conditions can compromise the sample’s integrity and lead to unreliable results.

  • Temperature control: Blood samples should be stored at a consistent temperature, typically between 2-8 degrees Celsius, to prevent bacterial growth and chemical changes.
  • Proper labeling: Each blood sample must be accurately labeled with the patient’s information, date, and time of collection to ensure proper identification and handling.
  • Secure storage: Samples should be stored in a secure location to prevent unauthorized access and potential tampering.

In some cases, contamination can occur during the collection process. For instance, using an alcohol swab to clean the skin before drawing blood can introduce alcohol into the sample, leading to falsely elevated BAC levels. It’s essential to scrutinize the collection procedures to identify any potential sources of contamination.

Differences Between Serum and Whole Blood Tests

Hospital blood tests often use serum rather than whole blood, which can result in higher BAC readings. Serum is the liquid portion of the blood after the solid components, such as red and white blood cells, have been removed. This concentration of alcohol in the serum can be higher than in whole blood, leading to discrepancies in BAC readings.

What is the difference between serum and whole blood tests? Serum tests are performed on the liquid portion of a drawn blood sample after the solid cellular components have been removed, while whole blood tests are performed on blood that has not been broken down into solid and liquid components.

The difference in alcohol concentration between serum and whole blood can be significant. The average ratio of serum BAC to whole blood BAC is approximately 1.14:1, meaning serum BAC readings can be about 14% higher than whole blood readings. This discrepancy can be used to challenge the accuracy of hospital blood test results in DUI cases.

To convert a serum BAC reading to a whole blood equivalent, you can use the following formula:

Step Conversion
Step 1 Convert the units to g/100 mL (if necessary).
Step 2 Divide the serum BAC reading by 1.14 to obtain the whole blood equivalent.

For example, if a serum BAC reading is 0.120 g/100 mL, the whole blood equivalent would be:

0.120 / 1.14 = 0.105 g/100 mL

This conversion is crucial for accurately interpreting BAC levels and challenging inflated readings in court. For more information on the differences between serum and whole blood tests, you can explore our guide on DUI blood tests vs. breathalyzer tests.

Chain of Custody and Procedural Errors

Another critical aspect of challenging hospital blood tests in DUI cases is the chain of custody. The chain of custody refers to the documentation that tracks the handling, storage, and transfer of the blood sample from the moment it is collected until it is presented in court. Any break or inconsistency in the chain of custody can lead to questions about the sample’s integrity and reliability.

For example, if the blood sample was not stored properly or if there were gaps in the documentation, it could be argued that the sample may have been tampered with or contaminated. This can significantly weaken the prosecution’s case and potentially lead to the exclusion of the blood test results as evidence.

  • Documentation of each person who handled the sample: This includes medical staff, law enforcement officers, and lab technicians.
  • Details of how the sample was stored: Proper storage conditions must be maintained to prevent degradation or contamination.
  • Records of any transfers of the sample: Each transfer must be documented to ensure the sample’s integrity.

Ensuring a proper chain of custody is crucial for the admissibility of hospital blood test results in DUI cases. Any discrepancies can be used to challenge the validity of the evidence.

What is the chain of custody? The chain of custody is the documentation that tracks the handling, storage, and transfer of a blood sample from collection to presentation in court.

In conclusion, understanding the scientific and procedural issues associated with hospital blood tests is essential for effectively challenging their validity in DUI cases. By addressing contamination, storage issues, and differences between serum and whole blood tests, you can build a robust defense against hospital blood test results. For more detailed information on defending against blood test results, visit our Comprehensive DUI Blood Test Guide.


Strategies for Defending Against Hospital Blood Test Results

Effectively defending against hospital blood test results requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses both legal and scientific aspects. This section will outline various defense strategies, including filing motions to suppress evidence, utilizing expert testimony, and challenging the reliability of the test results.

Expert Testimony and Independent Testing

Expert testimony can be invaluable in challenging hospital blood test results. A forensic toxicologist can explain the potential inaccuracies and procedural errors in the blood test process. Additionally, requesting an independent blood test can provide a basis for comparison and highlight discrepancies in the prosecution’s evidence. These strategies can help undermine the credibility of the hospital blood test results and strengthen your defense.

What is expert testimony? Expert testimony involves a qualified expert providing their professional opinion on specific aspects of a case, often to clarify complex scientific or technical issues for the court.

In DUI cases, forensic toxicologists play a crucial role in scrutinizing the methodologies and procedures used in hospital blood tests. They can identify potential issues such as:

  • Contamination: Highlighting how improper handling or storage could have compromised the sample.
  • Methodology: Explaining the differences between serum and whole blood tests and how they impact BAC readings.
  • Equipment: Questioning the accuracy and calibration of the equipment used for testing.

Independent testing involves having a separate laboratory analyze the blood sample. This can reveal discrepancies and provide a comparison to the prosecution’s results. If the independent test shows significantly different BAC levels, it can cast doubt on the reliability of the hospital’s test.

Filing Motions to Suppress Evidence

One of the most powerful tools in defending against hospital blood test results is filing a motion to suppress the evidence. This legal maneuver seeks to exclude the blood test results from being used in court on various grounds.

What is a motion to suppress? A motion to suppress is a legal request to exclude certain evidence from being presented in court, often due to violations of the defendant’s rights or procedural errors.

In the context of hospital blood tests, motions to suppress can be based on several factors:

  • Lack of Consent: If the blood was drawn without the individual’s consent or a valid warrant, the results might be inadmissible.
  • Chain of Custody Issues: Any gaps or inconsistencies in the documentation tracking the blood sample’s handling can undermine its integrity.
  • Improper Procedures: Highlighting procedural errors during the blood draw or testing process.

For example, if a subpoena was used to obtain the blood sample without proper notice to the defendant, your attorney can file a motion to suppress the evidence. This can be a critical step in weakening the prosecution’s case.

Challenging the Reliability of the Test Results

Another effective strategy is to challenge the reliability of the hospital blood test results. This involves questioning the scientific validity and accuracy of the test itself. Key areas to focus on include:

Police Lights in Florida Suburb Night

  • Testing Method: Hospital blood tests often use serum rather than whole blood, which can result in higher BAC readings. The difference between serum and whole blood BAC levels can be significant, as serum BAC readings can be about 14% higher.
  • Contamination: Improper handling or storage of the blood sample can lead to contamination, affecting the test results.
  • Equipment Calibration: The accuracy of the test depends on the proper calibration and maintenance of the testing equipment.

For instance, if the hospital used an enzymatic assay test, which is common for determining alcohol concentration in plasma or serum, it is essential to understand that the results will be 16-25% higher than in whole blood. This discrepancy can be leveraged to challenge the BAC level reported by the hospital.

Moreover, the defense can argue that the hospital’s blood tests are not scientifically accurate but are merely used as screening tests to determine approximate levels of alcohol. This argument can be supported by highlighting the lack of quality control and proper chain of custody, which are critical for forensic testing.

Leveraging legal precedents and case law can also be an effective strategy in defending against hospital blood test results. Familiarity with relevant case law can provide a basis for challenging the admissibility and reliability of the evidence.

For example, in Baber v. State, 775 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 2000), the Florida Supreme Court established that hospital blood test records could be admitted in DUI cases. However, the subsequent decision in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), complicated the introduction of such evidence by emphasizing the requirements of confrontation. This means that additional expert evidence may be necessary to support the hospital blood test results.

Additionally, the defense can cite cases like State v. Bender, 382 So.2d 697 (Fla. 1980), which outline the three-prong proper predicate for scientific tests: the test must be reliable, performed by a qualified operator with the proper equipment, and supported by expert testimony concerning the meaning of the test.

By understanding and applying these legal precedents, the defense can build a robust argument against the admissibility and reliability of hospital blood test results.

Addressing Privacy Concerns and Constitutional Rights

Finally, addressing privacy concerns and constitutional rights can be a powerful defense strategy. In Florida, medical records are protected under Article I, Section 23 of the Florida Constitution, which guarantees the right to privacy.

What is the right to privacy? The right to privacy is a constitutional guarantee that protects individuals from unwarranted governmental intrusion into their personal lives, including their medical records.

To overcome this right, the prosecution must demonstrate a compelling interest in having the records disclosed. This often involves proving that the medical records are relevant to an ongoing criminal investigation. If the prosecution fails to establish this relevance, the defense can argue that the disclosure of medical records violates the defendant’s constitutional rights.

For example, in Faber v. State, 157 So.3d 429 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015), the court granted a certiorari petition where the trial court allowed the disclosure of medical records without sufficient proof of relevance. This case highlights the importance of challenging the prosecution’s justification for accessing medical records.

By addressing privacy concerns and constitutional rights, the defense can further weaken the prosecution’s case and protect the defendant’s rights.

In conclusion, defending against hospital blood test results requires a multi-faceted approach that includes utilizing expert testimony, filing motions to suppress evidence, challenging the reliability of the test results, leveraging legal precedents, and addressing privacy concerns. By employing these strategies, you can build a strong defense and increase your chances of achieving a favorable outcome in your DUI case.

For more detailed information on defending against blood test results, visit our Comprehensive DUI Blood Test Guide and explore the various strategies and legal precedents that can help you in your case.


Infographic depicting the words How Hospital Blood Tests Can Make or Break Your DUI Case


What factors can affect the accuracy of hospital blood tests in DUI cases?

Several factors can affect the accuracy of hospital blood tests in DUI cases. These include contamination, improper storage, and the use of serum instead of whole blood. Contamination can occur if the sample is not handled correctly, while improper storage can lead to sample degradation. Additionally, serum blood tests can show higher BAC levels compared to whole blood tests.

Can hospital blood test results be challenged in court?

Yes, hospital blood test results can be challenged in court. Common grounds for challenging these results include lack of consent, chain of custody issues, and questioning the reliability of the testing methods. Legal strategies may involve filing motions to suppress the evidence or utilizing expert testimony to highlight potential inaccuracies and procedural errors.

What is the difference between serum and whole blood tests in DUI cases?

The difference between serum and whole blood tests in DUI cases lies in the sample used. Serum tests analyze the liquid portion of the blood after removing the solid components, often resulting in higher BAC readings. Whole blood tests, on the other hand, analyze the entire blood sample, providing a more accurate representation of the BAC.

How can expert testimony help in defending against hospital blood test results?

Expert testimony can be crucial in defending against hospital blood test results. A forensic toxicologist can explain the potential inaccuracies and procedural errors in the blood test process. They can highlight issues such as contamination, improper storage, and the differences between serum and whole blood tests, thereby undermining the credibility of the prosecution’s evidence.

Other Practice Areas We Serve

Explore additional areas of practice we specialize in to see how we can assist you with various legal needs:

Comprehensive Guide to DUI Blood Tests In-Depth Look at Florida DUI Blood Tests
Exigent Circumstances for Warrantless Blood Draws Impact of Hospital Blood Tests on DUI Defense
Winning a Blood Test DUI Errors Invalidating DUI Blood Tests
Right to Independent DUI Testing DUI Blood and Urine Analysis Protocol
Blocking Medical Record Subpoenas Blood Alcohol Analyst Permits
Blood Testing Methods in DUI Defense Chain of Custody in DUI Blood Tests
Contamination and DUI Blood Tests False Positives in DUI Blood Tests
Expert Witnesses in DUI Blood Cases Police Blood Draw at Hospital

Top-Rated DUI Lawyers Serving Florida

Looking for the best DUI lawyers in Florida? Our distinguished team of attorneys is committed to offering you the best possible defense against your DUI charges.

  • John Vallillo: As a stalwart in the Florida legal scene, John Vallillo has earned his stripes through a consistent record of case dismissals and proactive defense. His background as both a prosecutor and defense attorney enriches his strategic defense planning with invaluable insights.
  • Joe Easton: Renowned for crafting winning defenses, Joe Easton’s approach to legal advocacy in Florida combines thorough preparation with aggressive representation. His notable recognitions and ratings stand testament to his exceptional service and client-focused approach.
  • Joel Leppard: Joel Leppard infuses every DUI case with a level of personal commitment and innovative thinking that sets him apart. His leadership has not only grown Leppard Law into a top-rated criminal defense law firm but also ensured that clients receive empathetic, effective legal care.

Hear From Our Satisfied Clients

Serving our DUI clients with complete dedication, every case is a testament to our hard work. The appreciative feedback we receive underscores our commitment to excellence.








Contact Us Today for Your Best Defense

At Leppard Law: DUI Attorneys, we understand the critical role that hospital blood tests can play in your DUI case. Our team is dedicated to providing personalized, compassionate, and expert legal representation to ensure the best possible outcome for you. We treat our clients like family, always putting your best interests first.

Don’t face this challenging time alone. With our extensive experience and commitment to excellence, we are here to help you navigate through the complexities of DUI charges.

Experience our award-winning service for yourself:

  • Named as one of the “Top Personal Injury Lawyers in Orlando, FL” for 2023 by Expertise
  • Highlighted among the “Top DUI Attorneys near Melbourne, FL” for 2023 by Thumbtack
  • Listed among the “Best DUI Lawyers in Orlando, FL” by Expertise
  • Featured in the “Top 10 Best DUI Law Near Orlando, FL” by Yelp
  • Recognized as a SuperLawyers “Rising Star” by SuperLawyers in 2019-2020

Our attorneys are not only known for their legal skills but also for their client-focused approach. We promise to provide each client’s case with the time, attention, and skillful representation it deserves. Our experienced criminal lawyers offer the same resources as larger firms, but with a unique dedication to personal attention.

With over 60 years of combined experience defending thousands of Floridians accused of crimes, our attorneys are renowned for both their trial advocacy and skillful negotiations. Whether you’re facing a misdemeanor or a felony, our team is here to help you achieve the best possible outcome.

Rest easy and pick up the phone. We’re here to help!

Contact us today to schedule a free consultation:

Leppard Law: DUI Attorneys

Phone: 407-476-4111

Trusted Content


Legally Reviewed by Joe Easton

Experienced Florida DUI Attorney

Legally reviewed by Joe Easton and the content team, this article reflects the firm’s 60 years of combined criminal defense expertise. Joe Easton, with his extensive experience and strategic prowess in DUI and criminal defense, offers more than just legal representation; he brings a commitment to turning legal challenges into triumphs. His approach, combining tenacity in the courtroom with personalized client care, ensures your DUI case is not just defended but championed with dedication and expertise.

Learn More About Joe Easton