fbpx

What ‘Volume Not Met’ Means on the Intoxilyzer 8000 in a Florida DUI Case




Understanding ‘Volume Not Met’ on the Intoxilyzer 8000 in Florida DUI Cases

The term “Volume Not Met” on the Intoxilyzer 8000 is a critical aspect in Florida DUI cases. This message indicates that the breath sample provided did not meet the required volume for an accurate breath alcohol content (BAC) measurement. According to Florida Statutes, an approved breath alcohol test requires a minimum of two samples of breath collected within fifteen minutes of each other, with each sample producing results within .020 g/210L. Failing to meet the required volume can have significant implications in DUI cases.

In Florida, any person operating a vehicle is deemed to have consented to a breath test to determine their BAC. To be valid, the test must comply with methods approved by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). The breath test must include at least two samples collected within fifteen minutes, analyzed using an approved instrument like the Intoxilyzer 8000. These samples must produce results within .020 g/210L to be considered valid.

What is an approved breath alcohol test? An approved breath alcohol test is defined as a minimum of two breath samples collected within fifteen minutes of each other, analyzed using an approved breath test instrument, producing two results within .020 g/210L, and reported as the breath alcohol level.

According to Fla. Admin Code Ann. R. 11D-8.002(12), an approved breath alcohol test must follow these guidelines to ensure accuracy and reliability. This regulation is crucial in DUI cases as it establishes the framework for what constitutes a valid breath test.

However, a low-volume breath test reading that the State seeks to introduce is not in compliance with the implied consent law because it does not fall within the definition of an approved breath alcohol test. This can lead to disputes and challenges in court, as the defense may argue that the test was invalid due to insufficient volume.

In many cases, the breath test operator or arresting officer may argue that the driver was intentionally not blowing enough air into the machine, which meant the driver actually “refused” to submit the number of valid breath test samples required. This argument can complicate the legal proceedings, making it essential to understand the nuances of breath test regulations and court rulings.

Two key issues arise in these cases:

  • Administrative Suspension for Refusal: Should the driver suffer an administrative suspension for “refusal”? In Wilson v. State, Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, the court found that a “volume not met” exception message would not turn an otherwise valid breath test reading into a refusal for purposes of a formal review hearing.
  • Prosecutor’s Argument in Court: Should the prosecutor be allowed to show the jury the over .08 breath test reading and also argue that a refusal occurred? In State v. Troiano, the court held that it is unfairly prejudicial to a Defendant to permit testimony as to both a refusal and an unlawful breath-alcohol level.

Understanding these legal precedents is crucial for anyone facing a DUI charge in Florida, as they highlight the importance of challenging the reliability and validity of breath test results.

Why is breath volume important in testing? The breath volume is important because it ensures that the breath being measured actually comes from the deep part of the lungs, which provides a more accurate BAC reading.

Accurate volume measurement ensures that the breath sample comes from the deep part of the lungs, providing a more accurate BAC reading. The first 1.1 liters of exhaled breath can contain residual alcohol from the mouth, throat, and esophagus, leading to artificially high results. Therefore, the Intoxilyzer 8000 must accurately measure the breath volume to avoid these inaccuracies.

For more detailed information on DUI breath testing essentials, you can refer to our comprehensive guide on DUI Breath Testing Essentials.


Implications of ‘Volume Not Met’ in DUI Cases

When the Intoxilyzer 8000 displays a “Volume Not Met” message, it can lead to significant disputes in DUI cases. This message indicates that the breath sample provided did not meet the required volume for an accurate breath alcohol content (BAC) measurement. The prosecution may argue that the driver intentionally did not blow enough air, thus refusing to submit valid breath samples. However, courts have ruled that a “Volume Not Met” message does not automatically constitute a refusal. For instance, in Wilson v. State, the court found that a “Volume Not Met” message does not turn a valid breath test into a refusal for administrative suspension purposes.

Impact on Administrative Suspensions and Criminal Proceedings

The “Volume Not Met” message can affect both the administrative suspension of a driver’s license and the criminal proceedings. While the prosecution may argue refusal, courts have often found it unfairly prejudicial to present both a refusal and an unlawful BAC reading. This dual argument can complicate the defense, making it essential to understand the nuances of breath test regulations and court rulings.

What 'Volume Not Met' Means on the Intoxilyzer 8000 in a Florida DUI Case

In administrative suspension cases, if the driver is accused of refusal, it can lead to a suspension of their driver’s license. However, as noted in Wilson v. State, the court ruled that a “Volume Not Met” message does not automatically equate to refusal. This ruling is crucial because it highlights that the breath test must meet specific criteria to be considered valid under Florida law. If the breath test does not meet these criteria, it cannot be used as evidence of refusal.

In criminal proceedings, the implications of a “Volume Not Met” message are equally significant. Prosecutors may attempt to introduce the breath test results despite the insufficient volume. However, courts have ruled that it is unfairly prejudicial to present both a refusal and an unlawful BAC reading. For instance, in State v. Troiano, the court held that allowing testimony about both a refusal and an unlawful breath-alcohol level is prejudicial to the defendant. This ruling underscores the importance of challenging the reliability and validity of breath test results in DUI cases.

What does “Volume Not Met” mean on the Intoxilyzer 8000? “Volume Not Met” indicates that the breath sample provided did not meet the required volume for an accurate BAC measurement.

Understanding these legal precedents is crucial for anyone facing a DUI charge in Florida, as they highlight the importance of challenging the reliability and validity of breath test results. The defense can argue that the breath test did not comply with the methods approved by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), making it inadmissible in court.

Moreover, the defense can scrutinize the procedures followed by the breath test operator. For example, the operator must ensure that the breath samples are collected within fifteen minutes of each other and that they produce results within .020 g/210L. If these procedures are not followed, the breath test results can be challenged as invalid.

Another critical aspect to consider is the calibration and maintenance of the Intoxilyzer 8000. The machine must be properly calibrated and maintained to ensure accurate results. Any errors in calibration or maintenance can lead to inaccurate BAC readings, which can be challenged in court. For more information on how calibration and maintenance affect Intoxilyzer 8000 results, refer to our detailed guide on Intoxilyzer 8000 Calibration and Maintenance.

The defense can also argue that the “Volume Not Met” message indicates an unreliable sample. According to Fla. Admin Code Ann. R. 11D-8.002(12), an approved breath alcohol test must include at least two samples collected within fifteen minutes, analyzed using an approved instrument, and producing results within .020 g/210L. If the breath test does not meet these criteria, it cannot be considered valid evidence of BAC.

In conclusion, the “Volume Not Met” message on the Intoxilyzer 8000 has significant implications for DUI cases in Florida. It can affect both the administrative suspension of a driver’s license and the criminal proceedings. Understanding the legal precedents and challenging the reliability and validity of breath test results is crucial for building a strong defense against DUI charges.

For further reading on common errors in breath test machines and their implications for DUI cases, explore our comprehensive article on Common Intoxilyzer 8000 Errors.


Why Accurate Volume Measurement is Crucial in Breath Testing

Accurate volume measurement is vital to ensure that the breath sample comes from the deep part of the lungs, which provides a more accurate BAC reading. The first 1.1 liters of exhaled breath can contain residual alcohol from the mouth, throat, and esophagus, leading to artificially high results. The Intoxilyzer 8000 must accurately measure the breath volume to avoid these inaccuracies.

Potential Errors in Volume Measurement

Errors in volume measurement can occur if the Intoxilyzer 8000 incorrectly reads the breath volume. For example, if the machine reads one liter of breath as two, it may measure mouth alcohol, leading to inflated BAC results. Conversely, if it reads two liters as one, it may conclude that the driver refused to blow sufficient volume, potentially resulting in a license suspension for refusal.

Why is accurate volume measurement crucial in breath testing? Accurate volume measurement ensures that the breath sample comes from the deep part of the lungs, providing a more accurate BAC reading.

One of the safeguards of the Intoxilyzer 8000 is its ability to record the volume of each breath. When a breath sample is less than 1.1 liters, the machine should report a “volume not met” warning. However, if the machine fails to provide this warning and incorrectly calculates the sample volume, it can significantly impact the results. For more insights into how breath test machines work, check out our comprehensive guide on DUI Breath Testing Essentials.

Additionally, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) requires that breath tests be performed substantially in compliance with approved methods. This includes ensuring that the breath volume is accurately measured. Any deviation from these approved methods can render the breath test results invalid under the implied consent law. For more details on the importance of compliance, refer to our article on Intoxilyzer 8000 Calibration and Maintenance.

Errors in volume measurement can arise due to several factors, including:

  • Calibration Issues: The Intoxilyzer 8000 must be properly calibrated to ensure accurate volume measurement. Any errors in calibration can lead to inaccurate BAC readings.
  • Software Flaws: The machine’s software may have flaws that affect its ability to measure breath volume accurately.
  • Operator Errors: The breath test operator must follow specific procedures to ensure accurate volume measurement. Any deviation from these procedures can lead to errors.

In State v. Williams, an expert testified about anomalies in the COBRA printouts that referenced “volume” or “volume not met.” These anomalies included instances where the Intoxilyzer 8000 registered a breath test result without a sufficient breath test volume of 1.1 liters or indicated “no sample provided” but still registered a breath test result. Such inconsistencies raise significant questions about the reliability of the breath test results.

Moreover, the Intoxilyzer 8000 Instrument Specification Sheets provided by C.M.I., the manufacturer, indicate that volume measurement accuracies on the machine are plus or minus 10%. This margin of error can have a substantial impact on the breath test results, making it crucial to scrutinize the machine’s calibration and maintenance records. For a deeper understanding of common errors in breath test machines, visit our page on Common Intoxilyzer 8000 Errors.

Given these potential errors, it is essential to challenge the reliability of breath test results in DUI cases. Defense attorneys can argue that the breath test did not comply with the methods approved by the FDLE, making it inadmissible in court. They can also scrutinize the procedures followed by the breath test operator and the calibration and maintenance records of the Intoxilyzer 8000.

In conclusion, accurate volume measurement is crucial in breath testing to ensure reliable BAC readings. Errors in volume measurement can lead to artificially high results or conclusions of refusal, significantly impacting DUI cases. Understanding the potential errors and challenging the reliability of breath test results is essential for building a strong defense.

For more information on how to defend against breath test results, explore our detailed guide on Defending Against Breath Test Results.



Challenges in Proving Breath Test Reliability

Proving the reliability of breath test results is a critical aspect of defending a DUI case. If the Intoxilyzer 8000 fails to measure breath volume accurately, it can lead to significant questions about the validity of the test results. Courts have consistently ruled that for breath test results to be admissible, their reliability must be established beyond doubt. When the machine reports a “Volume Not Met” message, it indicates that the sample volume was insufficient, which can undermine the credibility of the test.

Several legal precedents highlight the importance of challenging the reliability of breath test results. For instance, in State v. Troiano, the court ruled that it is unfairly prejudicial to present both a refusal and an unlawful BAC reading to the jury. Similarly, in Wilson v. State, the court found that a “Volume Not Met” message does not automatically constitute a refusal for administrative suspension purposes. These rulings provide a strong foundation for defense attorneys to argue that a “Volume Not Met” message indicates an unreliable sample, making it inadmissible in court.

Defense attorneys can employ several strategies to challenge the reliability of breath test results:

  • Scrutinizing Breath Test Procedures: Defense attorneys can examine whether the breath test was conducted in substantial compliance with the methods approved by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE). Any deviation from these methods can render the test results invalid.
  • Reviewing Machine Calibration Records: The calibration and maintenance records of the Intoxilyzer 8000 are crucial in establishing the reliability of the test results. Any inconsistencies or lapses in calibration can be used to challenge the accuracy of the breath test.
  • Highlighting Software Flaws: The Intoxilyzer 8000 has undergone numerous software changes that can affect its analytical capabilities. Identifying and exposing these flaws can cast doubt on the reliability of the test results.

For more insights into challenging breath test results, explore our detailed guide on Defending Against Breath Test Results.

In DUI cases, the prosecution often relies heavily on breath test results to establish impairment. However, if the breath test machine fails to measure the breath volume accurately, it can lead to artificially high BAC readings or conclusions of refusal. This makes it essential to challenge the reliability of the breath test results vigorously.

Case Study: State v. Williams

In State v. Williams, an expert testified about anomalies in the COBRA printouts that referenced “volume” or “volume not met.” These anomalies included instances where the Intoxilyzer 8000 registered a breath test result without a sufficient breath test volume of 1.1 liters or indicated “no sample provided” but still registered a breath test result. Such inconsistencies raise significant questions about the reliability of the breath test results.

What is the significance of a “Volume Not Met” message on the Intoxilyzer 8000? A “Volume Not Met” message indicates that the breath sample provided was insufficient, raising questions about the reliability of the breath test results.

Moreover, the Intoxilyzer 8000 Instrument Specification Sheets provided by C.M.I., the manufacturer, indicate that volume measurement accuracies on the machine are plus or minus 10%. This margin of error can have a substantial impact on the breath test results, making it crucial to scrutinize the machine’s calibration and maintenance records. For a deeper understanding of common errors in breath test machines, visit our page on Common Intoxilyzer 8000 Errors.

Given these potential errors, it is essential to challenge the reliability of breath test results in DUI cases. Defense attorneys can argue that the breath test did not comply with the methods approved by the FDLE, making it inadmissible in court. They can also scrutinize the procedures followed by the breath test operator and the calibration and maintenance records of the Intoxilyzer 8000.

Another critical aspect to consider is the impact of medical conditions and external factors on breath test results. For instance, conditions like GERD (Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease) can cause alcohol to be present in the mouth, leading to inflated BAC readings. Similarly, certain diets and medications can also skew breath test results. Understanding these factors is crucial in building a robust defense. For more information, refer to our article on How Diet and Medical Conditions Can Skew Breath Test Results.

In conclusion, challenging the reliability of breath test results is a multifaceted process that requires a thorough understanding of breath test procedures, machine calibration, and potential errors. By scrutinizing these aspects, defense attorneys can build a strong case to challenge the validity of the breath test results and protect their clients’ rights.

What 'Volume Not Met' Means on the Intoxilyzer 8000 in a Florida DUI Case


Infographic depicting the words What 'Volume Not Met' Means on the Intoxilyzer 8000 in a Florida DUI Case


What does ‘Volume Not Met’ mean on the Intoxilyzer 8000?

The term ‘Volume Not Met’ on the Intoxilyzer 8000 means that the breath sample provided did not meet the required volume for an accurate blood alcohol content (BAC) measurement. This message indicates that the sample volume was insufficient for the test to be considered valid under Florida’s DUI laws.

How does ‘Volume Not Met’ affect a DUI case in Florida?

The ‘Volume Not Met’ message can significantly impact a DUI case in Florida. It may lead to disputes regarding the validity of the breath test results. The prosecution might argue that the driver intentionally did not blow enough air, which could be considered a refusal. However, courts have ruled that this message does not automatically constitute a refusal.

Can a ‘Volume Not Met’ message lead to a license suspension?

Yes, a ‘Volume Not Met’ message can potentially lead to a license suspension if it is argued that the driver refused to provide a valid breath sample. However, courts have found that this message alone does not constitute a refusal for administrative suspension purposes, as seen in cases like Wilson v. State.

What are the legal requirements for a valid breath test in Florida?

In Florida, a valid breath test must include at least two breath samples collected within fifteen minutes of each other, analyzed using an approved instrument like the Intoxilyzer 8000. These samples must produce results within .020 g/210L of each other to be considered valid. If the ‘Volume Not Met’ message appears, it indicates that these requirements were not met.


Explore additional areas of legal expertise we offer to support your needs:

DUI Breath Testing Essentials Intoxilyzer 8000 Calibration
Intoxilyzer 8000 Setup Intoxilyzer 8000 Errors
Interferent Detect Errors Retrograde Extrapolation Guide
Diet and Breath Tests Breathalyzer Accuracy
Blowing After DUI Arrest Defending Breath Test Results
Breath Test Margin of Error Breath Test Experts
Presumption vs Per Se DUI Best Handheld Breathalyzers
20-Minute Observation Period GERD and Breathalyzers

Top-Rated DUI Lawyers Serving Florida

Looking for the best DUI lawyers in Florida? Our distinguished team of attorneys is committed to offering you the best possible defense against your DUI charges.

  • John Vallillo: As a stalwart in the Florida legal scene, John Vallillo has earned his stripes through a consistent record of case dismissals and proactive defense. His background as both a prosecutor and defense attorney enriches his strategic defense planning with invaluable insights.
  • Joe Easton: Renowned for crafting winning defenses, Joe Easton’s approach to legal advocacy in Florida combines thorough preparation with aggressive representation. His notable recognitions and ratings stand testament to his exceptional service and client-focused approach.
  • Joel Leppard: Joel Leppard infuses every DUI case with a level of personal commitment and innovative thinking that sets him apart. His leadership has not only grown Leppard Law into a top-rated criminal defense law firm but also ensured that clients receive empathetic, effective legal care.

Discover What Our Clients Are Saying

At the forefront of our DUI practice is a deep-seated commitment to client satisfaction. Each case is handled with utmost care, as echoed in the appreciative feedback from those we represent. You can read more 5-star reviews here.








Take the Next Step: Secure Your Future with Leppard Law

Facing a DUI charge in Florida can be overwhelming, but you don’t have to go through it alone. At Leppard Law: DUI Attorneys, we understand the gravity of your situation and are here to provide the support and legal expertise you deserve. Our experienced team of attorneys is committed to treating every client like family, ensuring your best interests are always our top priority.

Contact us today at 407-476-4111 to schedule a free consultation. Discover firsthand how a personal relationship with your attorney can make all the difference in your case. Let us fight for the best possible outcome for you.

But don’t just take our word for it:

Award Granting Organization Year Criteria
SuperLawyers “Rising Star” SuperLawyers 2019 – 2020 Only 1.5% of lawyers selected by their peers
Awesome Attorneys Orlando Orlando Family Magazine 2019 – 2023 Selected by readers of Orlando Family Magazine and legal peers
10.0 Rating Avvo 2017 – Present Avvo’s ranking system
#5 “Fastest Growing Law Firm in the US” Law Firm 500 2019 Fastest Growing Law Firms in the US according to Law Firm 500 and independent auditing agency
#5 “Fastest Growing Law Firm in the US” Law Firm 500 2020 Fastest Growing Law Firms in the US according to Law Firm 500 and independent auditing agency

At Leppard Law, we are honored to be recognized among the best in our field. These accolades reflect our unwavering commitment to our clients and our community. If you or a loved one are facing a DUI charge, take the first step towards a strong defense by reaching out to us today.

Call us at 407-476-4111 to schedule your free consultation. Let us put our expertise to work for you.

Trusted Content


Legally Reviewed by Joe Easton

Experienced Florida DUI Attorney

Legally reviewed by Joe Easton and the content team, this article reflects the firm’s 60 years of combined criminal defense expertise. Joe Easton, with his extensive experience and strategic prowess in DUI and criminal defense, offers more than just legal representation; he brings a commitment to turning legal challenges into triumphs. His approach, combining tenacity in the courtroom with personalized client care, ensures your DUI case is not just defended but championed with dedication and expertise.

Learn More About Joe Easton