fbpx

When Can Duress Justify a DUI in Florida?



Understanding Duress in Florida DUI Cases

In Florida, the defense of duress can sometimes be used to justify actions that would otherwise be considered illegal, including driving under the influence (DUI). Duress involves situations where an individual is forced to act against their will due to immediate threats of harm. Understanding how duress applies to DUI cases is crucial for anyone facing such charges.

Definition of Duress

Duress is a legal defense that argues the defendant committed the offense under immediate threat of serious harm or death. This defense is particularly relevant in DUI cases where the individual had no reasonable alternative but to drive while impaired.

What is duress? Duress is a legal defense claiming that the defendant committed an offense due to immediate threats of serious harm or death, leaving them no reasonable alternative.

The Florida duress defense can apply when someone forces another person to drive or take actual physical control of a motor vehicle while intoxicated or impaired. In certain cases, a person may commit a DUI on an involuntary basis because of a particular set of circumstances that create an impending, imminent, and real danger to the defendant or another person the defendant is protecting.

For example, the duress defense might apply when a battered woman drives to escape an incident of domestic violence or when the victim of a crime drives away to avoid being further victimized. The key element here is that the danger must be impending, imminent, and real. The defendant must have had reasonable grounds to believe that this danger existed and drove under the influence for that reason.

The Florida Supreme Court has approved a standard jury instruction for necessity and duress, specifically Florida Standard Jury Instruction 3.6(k). This instruction helps jurors understand the legal standards for duress and how to apply them to the facts of the case.

Florida Standard Jury Instruction 3.6(k) provides guidelines for jurors on how to evaluate the duress defense in DUI cases.

It’s important to note that the duress defense is different from the necessity defense in DUI cases, although the issues are sometimes related. While duress involves immediate threats of harm forcing the defendant to act against their will, necessity involves choosing the lesser of two evils to prevent greater harm, even if no immediate threat exists.

Case Law Supporting Duress Defense

Several court cases have upheld the use of the duress defense in DUI and other traffic-related offenses. For instance, in Williams v. Sirmons, 563 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Fla. 2009), a Federal district court, interpreting Florida law, upheld the use of the necessity defense where a pregnant woman, who was in need of urgent medical care related to her pregnancy, drove away from a traffic stop to avoid imminent harm to her fetus.

Similarly, in Bozeman v. State, 714 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), the First District Court of Appeal of Florida held that a defendant in a felony driving with a suspended license case was entitled to the necessity defense where the defendant took the wheel to prevent a drunk driver from causing harm. In that case, the defendant believed he had no viable alternatives to driving since he thought he could get in trouble if he took the driver’s keys away and he had no money for a taxicab.

For more information on how to defend against DUI charges, you can explore our DUI Defense Guide or learn about strategies for winning your DUI case.

Criteria for Duress in DUI Cases

For duress to be a valid defense in a Florida DUI case, certain criteria must be met. These criteria ensure that the defendant’s actions were truly involuntary and driven by an imminent threat.

Duress in Florida DUI cases, including domestic violence scenarios

  • Immediate Threat: The danger must be impending, imminent, and real.
  • No Reasonable Alternative: The defendant must have had no viable alternatives to avoid the threat.
  • Proportional Response: The defendant’s response to the threat must be proportional to the level of danger.

Florida Standard Jury Instruction 3.6(k)

The Florida Supreme Court has approved specific jury instructions for cases involving duress. These instructions help jurors understand the legal standards for duress and how to apply them to the facts of the case.

Florida Standard Jury Instruction 3.6(k) provides guidelines for jurors on how to evaluate the duress defense in DUI cases.

To successfully use the duress defense in a DUI case, the defendant must demonstrate that they were under an immediate threat of serious harm or death. This threat must be so severe that it left the defendant with no reasonable alternative but to drive while impaired. The defendant’s actions must also be proportional to the threat they faced.

For example, if someone forces another person to drive by threatening them with a weapon, the person driving under duress must show that the threat was real and imminent. They must also show that they had no other option, such as calling the police or seeking help from bystanders.

In certain cases, a person may commit a DUI on an involuntary basis because of a particular set of circumstances that create an impending, imminent, and real danger to the defendant or another person the defendant is protecting. For instance, a battered woman might drive to escape an incident of domestic violence, or a crime victim might drive away to avoid further victimization.

The Florida duress defense may be available in a DUI case when the defendant had reasonable grounds to believe that the danger was impending, imminent, and real and drove under the influence for that reason. A standard jury instruction has been approved by the Florida Supreme Court for necessity and duress. See Florida Standard Jury Instruction 3.6(k).

It is important to differentiate between the duress defense and the necessity defense. While both defenses involve situations where the defendant had to break the law to avoid greater harm, they are distinct legal concepts. Duress involves immediate threats of harm forcing the defendant to act against their will, while necessity involves choosing the lesser of two evils to prevent greater harm, even if no immediate threat exists.

In Williams v. Sirmons, 563 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Fla. 2009), a Federal district court, interpreting Florida law, upheld the use of the necessity defense where a pregnant woman, who was in need of urgent medical care related to her pregnancy, drove away from a traffic stop to avoid imminent harm to her fetus. Similarly, in Bozeman v. State, 714 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), the First District Court of Appeal of Florida held that a defendant in a felony driving with a suspended license case was entitled to the necessity defense where the defendant took the wheel to prevent a drunk driver from causing harm. In that case, the defendant believed he had no viable alternatives to driving since he thought he could get in trouble if he took the driver’s keys away and he had no money for a taxicab.

Understanding these criteria is crucial for anyone facing DUI charges in Florida. By demonstrating that their actions were driven by an imminent threat and that they had no reasonable alternative, defendants can potentially use the duress defense to justify their actions. For more information on how to defend against DUI charges, you can explore our DUI Defense Guide or learn about strategies for winning your DUI case.

Examples of Duress Justifying a DUI

There are several scenarios where duress could potentially justify a DUI in Florida. These examples illustrate the types of situations where this defense might be applicable.

  • Domestic Violence: A person driving to escape an incident of domestic violence.
  • Crime Victim: A victim of a crime driving away to avoid further victimization.
  • Medical Emergency: A pregnant woman driving to seek urgent medical care.

When can duress justify a DUI? Duress can justify a DUI when the defendant is forced to drive under the influence due to an immediate threat of harm or death, leaving no reasonable alternative.

Understanding these scenarios is crucial for anyone facing DUI charges in Florida. Let’s delve deeper into each example to see how the duress defense can be applied in real-life situations.

Domestic Violence

Imagine a situation where a person is trapped in a violent domestic dispute. The immediate threat of physical harm or even death forces them to flee the scene. In such cases, driving under the influence may be the only viable option to escape the danger. The duress defense can be applied here, as the individual had no reasonable alternative but to drive while impaired to ensure their safety.

For more information on how to defend against DUI charges, you can explore our DUI Defense Guide or learn about strategies for winning your DUI case.

Crime Victim

Another example is when a person becomes a victim of a crime. If the perpetrator threatens them with immediate harm, the victim might have no choice but to drive away to avoid further victimization. In this scenario, the duress defense could be a valid justification for their actions. The key here is that the threat must be real and imminent, leaving the victim with no other reasonable options.

For instance, in Bozeman v. State, 714 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), the court upheld the necessity defense for a defendant who took the wheel to prevent a drunk driver from causing harm. The defendant believed he had no viable alternatives to driving since he thought he could get in trouble if he took the driver’s keys away and he had no money for a taxicab.

Medical Emergency

A medical emergency is another scenario where the duress defense might apply. Consider a pregnant woman who needs urgent medical care related to her pregnancy. If she drives under the influence to avoid imminent harm to herself or her fetus, the duress defense could be used to justify her actions. This was the case in Williams v. Sirmons, 563 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Fla. 2009), where a Federal district court upheld the necessity defense for a pregnant woman who drove away from a traffic stop to seek medical help.

These examples highlight the importance of understanding the specific circumstances that can justify a DUI under duress. For more insights into how different defenses can be used in DUI cases, check out our articles on intervening causes and accident report privilege.

By demonstrating that their actions were driven by an imminent threat and that they had no reasonable alternative, defendants can potentially use the duress defense to justify their actions. Understanding these criteria is crucial for anyone facing DUI charges in Florida. For more information on how to defend against DUI charges, you can explore our DUI Defense Guide or learn about strategies for winning your DUI case.


Differences Between Duress and Necessity Defenses

When it comes to defending against DUI charges in Florida, it’s essential to understand the key differences between the duress and necessity defenses. While both defenses can be used to justify actions that would otherwise be illegal, they are based on distinct legal principles.

  • Duress: Duress involves immediate threats of harm forcing the defendant to act against their will.
  • Necessity: Necessity involves choosing the lesser of two evils to prevent greater harm, even if no immediate threat exists.

What is the difference between duress and necessity? Duress involves immediate threats of harm forcing the defendant to act against their will, while necessity involves choosing the lesser of two evils to prevent greater harm, even if no immediate threat exists.

When to Use Each Defense

Choosing between duress and necessity defenses depends on the specific circumstances of the case. Let’s explore when each defense might be more appropriate.

  • Duress: This defense is more suitable when there is an immediate threat of serious harm or death. For example, if someone forces you to drive while intoxicated by threatening you with a weapon, you may be able to use the duress defense. It’s crucial to prove that you had no reasonable alternative but to comply with the threat.
  • Necessity: The necessity defense is applicable when you must choose between two harmful outcomes and opt for the lesser evil to prevent greater harm. For instance, if you drive under the influence to get a severely injured passenger to the hospital, you might argue that your actions were necessary to prevent a more significant harm. The key here is to demonstrate that your decision was reasonable under the circumstances.

Understanding when to use each defense can significantly impact the outcome of your case. For example, in Williams v. Sirmons, 563 F. Supp. 2d 1315 (M.D. Fla. 2009), the necessity defense was upheld for a pregnant woman who drove away from a traffic stop to seek urgent medical care for her fetus. Similarly, in Bozeman v. State, 714 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998), the court upheld the necessity defense for a defendant who took the wheel to prevent a drunk driver from causing harm.

These cases highlight the importance of understanding the nuances between duress and necessity defenses. For a more comprehensive understanding of DUI defenses, you can explore our DUI Defense Guide.

Both duress and necessity defenses have specific legal criteria that must be met for them to be valid. Here’s a breakdown of the requirements for each defense:

  • Duress:
    • Immediate Threat: The danger must be impending, imminent, and real.
    • No Reasonable Alternative: The defendant must have had no viable alternatives to avoid the threat.
    • Proportional Response: The defendant’s response to the threat must be proportional to the level of danger.
  • Necessity:
    • Greater Harm Avoided: The defendant must show that their actions were taken to prevent a greater harm.
    • No Legal Alternative: There must have been no legal alternative to the action taken.
    • Proportional Response: The harm caused by the defendant’s actions must be less than the harm avoided.

Meeting these criteria is essential for successfully arguing either defense. For instance, in cases involving accident report privilege, understanding the specific legal standards can be crucial for building a strong defense.

Legal precedents play a significant role in shaping the application of duress and necessity defenses. Let’s look at some notable cases:

  • Williams v. Sirmons: In this case, the necessity defense was upheld for a pregnant woman who drove away from a traffic stop to seek urgent medical care for her fetus. The court recognized the immediate need for medical attention as a valid reason for her actions.
  • Bozeman v. State: Here, the necessity defense was upheld for a defendant who took the wheel to prevent a drunk driver from causing harm. The court acknowledged that the defendant had no viable alternatives and acted to prevent a greater harm.

These cases underscore the importance of understanding the specific circumstances and legal criteria for each defense. For more insights into how different defenses can be used in DUI cases, check out our articles on intervening causes and strategies for winning your DUI case.

Practical Tips for Defendants

If you find yourself facing DUI charges and believe that either duress or necessity might apply to your case, here are some practical tips:

  • Document Everything: Keep detailed records of the events leading up to your DUI charge. This includes any threats, medical emergencies, or other circumstances that might support your defense.
  • Seek Legal Advice: Consult with an experienced DUI attorney who can help you evaluate your case and determine the best defense strategy. For expert legal representation, consider contacting our DUI defense lawyers.
  • Gather Evidence: Collect any evidence that supports your claim, such as witness statements, medical records, or police reports. This can strengthen your defense and improve your chances of a favorable outcome.

Understanding the differences between duress and necessity defenses and knowing when to use each can be crucial for anyone facing DUI charges in Florida. For more information on how to defend against DUI charges, you can explore our DUI Defense Guide or learn about strategies for winning your DUI case.

When Can Duress Justify a DUI in Florida?


Infographic depicting the words When Can Duress Justify a DUI in Florida?


Can duress be used as a defense for DUI in Florida?

Yes, duress can be used as a defense for DUI in Florida. The Florida duress defense applies when someone is forced to drive or take actual physical control of a motor vehicle while intoxicated due to an imminent threat of serious harm or death. For example, a person might drive under duress to escape an incident of domestic violence.

What are the legal criteria for using duress as a defense in a DUI case?

To use duress as a defense in a DUI case, certain legal criteria must be met:

  • Immediate Threat: There must be an immediate threat of serious harm or death.
  • No Reasonable Alternative: The defendant must have had no reasonable alternative to avoid the threat.
  • Proportional Response: The response must be proportional to the level of danger.

These criteria ensure that the defendant’s actions were truly involuntary.

How does the duress defense differ from the necessity defense in DUI cases?

The duress defense differs from the necessity defense in that duress involves immediate threats of harm forcing the defendant to act against their will, while necessity involves choosing the lesser of two evils to prevent a greater harm, even if no immediate threat exists. Understanding these differences is crucial for effectively arguing a DUI case in Florida.

What are some examples of situations where duress might justify a DUI?

Examples of situations where duress might justify a DUI include:

  • Domestic Violence: A person driving to escape an incident of domestic violence.
  • Crime Victim: A victim of a crime driving away to avoid further victimization.
  • Medical Emergency: A pregnant woman driving to seek urgent medical care.

These scenarios illustrate the types of situations where the duress defense might be applicable in Florida.


Explore additional practice areas we serve to find the legal expertise you need:

DUI Defense Guide Winning DUI Strategies
Strengthen DUI Defense Motion to Suppress Impact
Intervening Causes in DUI Involuntary Intoxication Claims
Lack of Probable Cause Warrantless DUI Defenses
Compel Discovery Motions Bank Statement DUI Defense
Brady Material in DUI Medical Issues Mistaken for DUI
Concussions Impair DUI Investigation Effective Trial Objections
Corroborating Eyewitness Testimony Officer Disciplinary Record Impact

Top-Rated DUI Lawyers Serving Florida

Looking for the best DUI lawyers in Florida? Our distinguished team of attorneys is committed to offering you the best possible defense against your DUI charges.

  • John Vallillo: As a stalwart in the Florida legal scene, John Vallillo has earned his stripes through a consistent record of case dismissals and proactive defense. His background as both a prosecutor and defense attorney enriches his strategic defense planning with invaluable insights.
  • Joe Easton: Renowned for crafting winning defenses, Joe Easton’s approach to legal advocacy in Florida combines thorough preparation with aggressive representation. His notable recognitions and ratings stand testament to his exceptional service and client-focused approach.
  • Joel Leppard: Joel Leppard infuses every DUI case with a level of personal commitment and innovative thinking that sets him apart. His leadership has not only grown Leppard Law into a top-rated criminal defense law firm but also ensured that clients receive empathetic, effective legal care.

Discover What Our Clients Are Saying

At the forefront of our DUI practice is a deep-seated commitment to client satisfaction. Each case is handled with utmost care, as echoed in the appreciative feedback from those we represent. Stellar reviews are what make us one consistently one of Central Florida’s top-rated DUI law firms. You can read more 5 star reviews here: https://leppardlaw.com/reviews/








Secure Your Defense with Leppard Law Today

Dealing with a DUI charge under duress can be incredibly stressful. At Leppard Law: DUI Attorneys, we understand the complexities of your situation and are here to help. Our team is dedicated to providing you with the best possible defense, treating you like family, and always putting your best interests first.

What does it look like to have a personal relationship with your attorney? Someone who has your back when things get tough? A lawyer that knows you as well as they know your case? At Leppard Law, we treat our clients like family. We always put their best interests first and fight for the best possible outcome for their case.

But you don’t have to take our word for it—experience it for yourself. If you or a loved one have been charged with a DUI or any criminal offense, contact us today to schedule a free consultation. Call us at 407-476-4111 or visit our contact page.

Our accolades speak to our dedication and success:

  • Named as one of the “Top Personal Injury Lawyers in Orlando, FL” 2023 by Expertise
  • Highlighted among the “Top Personal Injury Attorneys near Sanford, FL” for 2023 by Thumbtack
  • Listed among the “Best Car Accident Lawyers in Sanford” from 2016-2023 by Expertise
  • Recognized as one of the “Top 10 DUI Attorneys near Orlando, FL” by Thumbtack
  • Ranked as #1 on Yelp’s list of “Best Lawyers in Orlando” (2024)

At Leppard Law, we take immense pride in helping our clients navigate through some of life’s most challenging moments. Your trust and support have fueled our commitment to excellence, and we’re honored to be a part of our shared community. While we hope you never face a criminal charge, we want you to know that if the need arises, we’re here for you.

“From Their Bench to Your Defense” – As former prosecutors, we’ve sat on their side and mastered their playbook. Now, we’re in your corner, defending your rights with exceptional dedication and expertise.

ONE call to our top-rated criminal defense attorneys can make all the difference. Schedule your consultation today, and let us provide the support and legal expertise you deserve. Call us now at 407-476-4111 or visit our contact page to get started.

Trusted Content


Legally Reviewed by Joe Easton

Experienced Florida DUI Attorney

Legally reviewed by Joe Easton and the content team, this article reflects the firm’s 60 years of combined criminal defense expertise. Joe Easton, with his extensive experience and strategic prowess in DUI and criminal defense, offers more than just legal representation; he brings a commitment to turning legal challenges into triumphs. His approach, combining tenacity in the courtroom with personalized client care, ensures your DUI case is not just defended but championed with dedication and expertise.

Learn More About Joe Easton