fbpx

The Role of Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) in Drug DUIs (And How to Beat Them)




Understanding the Role of Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) in Drug DUIs

Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) play a crucial role in identifying and prosecuting drug-impaired drivers. These certified officers undergo specialized training to recognize signs of drug influence that standard field sobriety tests may not detect. The DRE protocol involves a comprehensive 12-step evaluation process, including physical examinations and psychophysical tests, to determine impairment.

What is a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE)?

A Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) is a law enforcement officer trained to identify drug-impaired drivers. The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) certifies DREs, who must complete rigorous training and maintain their certification through regular evaluations and recertification courses.

What is a DRE? A Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) is a specially trained law enforcement officer certified to identify drug-impaired drivers through a series of physical and psychophysical tests.

DREs are frequently called upon to differentiate between drug influence and medical or mental disorders. Their training includes recognizing signs of impairment from various drug categories, such as depressants, stimulants, hallucinogens, and narcotic analgesics. The goal is to combat the adverse impact of drug and alcohol-impaired driving on our roads.

The requirements for DRE school were previously more demanding but have been somewhat relaxed over the years to allow more officers to qualify. Despite these changes, the certification process remains rigorous. To maintain their certification, DREs must conduct at least four evaluations within two years, submit a rolling log and current curriculum vitae, and attend eight hours of recertification training.

If a DRE is involved in your DUI case, it is essential to understand their role and the potential impact on your defense. Your criminal defense attorney can file motions to exclude DRE testimony at trial, especially if there are questions about the DRE’s qualifications or the validity of their evaluation.

In some cases, DRE evidence is admissible in court. However, courts have generally found that the Frye test does not apply to DRE evidence because the general portion of the DRE protocol is not considered scientific. This can be a critical point for defense attorneys to challenge the admissibility of DRE testimony.

For more on the role of DREs and how to challenge their evaluations, check out our detailed guide on how DRE evaluations influence DUI drug prosecutions in Florida.


The 12-Step DRE Protocol: How It Works

The DRE protocol is a systematic process used to assess whether a driver is under the influence of drugs. This 12-step evaluation includes a series of tests and observations that help the DRE determine the type of drug causing impairment. The steps range from initial breath alcohol tests to detailed physical examinations.

Drug Recognition Expert Protocol

Key Components of the DRE Protocol

The DRE protocol includes several critical steps such as measuring pupil size, observing pupil reactions to light, taking blood pressure and pulse rates, and conducting divided attention psychophysical tests. These steps are designed to identify specific drug categories and their effects on the body.

What is the DRE protocol? The DRE protocol is a 12-step evaluation process used by law enforcement to determine if a driver is under the influence of drugs.

Detailed Breakdown of the 12 Steps

  1. Breath Alcohol Test: The first step involves administering a breathalyzer to rule out alcohol as the cause of impairment.
  2. Interview of the Arresting Officer: The DRE interviews the arresting officer to gather information about the suspect’s behavior and driving patterns.
  3. Preliminary Examination and First Pulse: The DRE conducts a preliminary examination to assess the suspect’s physical condition and takes the first pulse reading.
  4. Eye Examination: This step includes checking for horizontal gaze nystagmus, vertical gaze nystagmus, and lack of convergence.
  5. Divided Attention Psychophysical Tests: The DRE administers tests such as the walk-and-turn, one-leg stand, and finger-to-nose tests to evaluate the suspect’s ability to divide attention.
  6. Vital Signs and Second Pulse: The DRE measures the suspect’s blood pressure, temperature, and takes a second pulse reading.
  7. Dark Room Examinations: This involves examining the suspect’s pupils under different lighting conditions to check for dilation or constriction.
  8. Examination for Muscle Tone: The DRE checks the suspect’s muscle tone by feeling the arms to determine if they are flaccid or rigid.
  9. Check for Injection Sites and Third Pulse: The DRE inspects the suspect’s body for signs of recent drug injection and takes a third pulse reading.
  10. Suspect’s Statements and Other Observations: The DRE records any statements made by the suspect and notes other relevant observations.
  11. Opinions of the Evaluator: Based on the findings, the DRE forms an opinion about the category of drugs causing impairment.
  12. Toxicological Examination: The final step involves collecting a biological sample (blood, urine, or saliva) for toxicological analysis to confirm the presence of drugs.

Each step in the protocol is designed to gather specific information that, when combined, helps the DRE make a well-informed assessment. For instance, measuring pupil size and observing reactions to light can indicate the use of stimulants or depressants. Similarly, divided attention tests assess the suspect’s cognitive and motor skills, which are often impaired by drug use.

It’s important to note that the DRE protocol is not without its challenges. While it provides a structured approach to identifying drug impairment, the accuracy and reliability of the tests can be influenced by various factors, including the DRE’s training and experience. This is why it’s crucial to understand the nuances of the protocol if you’re facing a DUI charge involving drug impairment.

For more insights on how the DRE protocol influences DUI drug prosecutions, you can read our detailed article on how DRE evaluations influence DUI drug prosecutions in Florida.

Training and Certification of DREs

Becoming a certified DRE involves completing two phases of training: academic and certification. The academic phase includes nine days of intensive training, covering topics such as physiology, vital signs, and standardized field sobriety testing (SFST). Students must pass written examinations and demonstrate proficiency in administering SFSTs.

The certification phase requires students to conduct a minimum of 12 drug influence evaluations under the supervision of a DRE instructor. They must identify subjects under the influence of at least three different drug categories and achieve a 75% toxicological confirmation rate. Additionally, students must maintain a progress log, rolling log, and submit a curriculum vitae. The final step is passing a comprehensive knowledge examination and obtaining endorsements from two certified DRE instructors.

For more information on the training requirements for DREs in Florida, visit our page on how field sobriety tests are used in DUI drug cases.

Understanding the rigorous training and certification process DREs undergo can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of their evaluations. This knowledge is essential for challenging DRE testimony in court and building a robust defense strategy.


Challenges in Admissibility of DRE Evidence in Court

One of the significant challenges in DUI cases involving DREs is the admissibility of their evidence in court. While some courts accept DRE testimony, others question its scientific validity. Defense attorneys often file motions to exclude DRE evidence, arguing that it does not meet the standards of scientific reliability.

The admissibility of DRE evidence often hinges on whether it meets the Frye or Daubert standards for scientific evidence. Courts may rule that the general portion of the DRE protocol is not scientific, making it easier for defense attorneys to challenge its validity.

Is the DRE evidence admissible? In some cases, DRE evidence is admissible. Generally, courts have found that the Frye test does not apply to DRE evidence because the general portion of the DRE protocol is not scientific.

In Florida, the Frye standard is often applied to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence. The Frye test requires that the scientific principles or methods used must be generally accepted by the relevant scientific community. However, the DRE protocol, which includes steps like measuring pupil size and observing reactions to light, is often considered non-scientific by the courts. This makes it easier for defense attorneys to argue against its admissibility.

Common Arguments Against DRE Evidence

Defense attorneys may use several strategies to challenge the admissibility of DRE evidence:

  • Questioning Scientific Validity: Attorneys may argue that the DRE protocol does not meet the scientific standards required for admissibility. They may point out that the protocol is based on observations and tests that are not scientifically validated.
  • Highlighting Inconsistencies: Any inconsistencies in the DRE’s observations or the protocol’s application can be used to challenge the credibility of the evidence.
  • Undermining DRE Qualifications: The defense may question the DRE’s training and experience, highlighting any gaps or deficiencies that could impact the reliability of their testimony.
  • Alternative Explanations: Presenting alternative explanations for the observed signs of impairment, such as medical conditions or fatigue, can cast doubt on the DRE’s conclusions.

For instance, the accuracy of police testimony can be scrutinized to reveal any inconsistencies or procedural errors. Additionally, defense attorneys can leverage expert witnesses to counter the DRE’s findings, providing alternative interpretations of the evidence.

Case Law and Precedents

Several court cases have addressed the admissibility of DRE evidence, setting important precedents:

  • Williams v. State, 710 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998): This case established that the general portion of the DRE protocol is not considered scientific under Frye, making it easier to challenge its admissibility.
  • Bragg v. State, 644 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994): In this case, the court ruled that certain aspects of the DRE protocol could be admitted as evidence, but emphasized the need for rigorous scrutiny of the DRE’s qualifications and methods.

Understanding these legal precedents is crucial for building a robust defense strategy. By leveraging case law, defense attorneys can effectively challenge the admissibility of DRE evidence and weaken the prosecution’s case.

For more insights on how to challenge DRE evidence, you can explore our detailed guide on excluding drug evidence in Florida DUIs.

Strategies for Defense Attorneys

Defense attorneys have several tactics at their disposal to challenge DRE evidence:

  1. Filing Motions to Suppress: Attorneys can file pre-trial motions to suppress DRE evidence, arguing that it does not meet the required standards of scientific reliability.
  2. Cross-Examining the DRE: During cross-examination, attorneys can question the DRE’s qualifications, training, and the methods used during the evaluation.
  3. Presenting Expert Witnesses: Expert witnesses can provide alternative interpretations of the evidence, challenging the DRE’s conclusions and offering explanations that support the defense’s case.
  4. Highlighting Protocol Flaws: Any flaws or inconsistencies in the DRE protocol can be used to undermine the credibility of the evidence.

For example, challenging the validity of field sobriety tests can be an effective strategy. These tests are often a component of the DRE protocol, and any issues with their administration or interpretation can cast doubt on the overall evaluation.

By employing these strategies, defense attorneys can effectively challenge DRE evidence and increase the chances of a favorable outcome for their clients.

For more information on how to build a strong defense in DUI drug cases, visit our comprehensive guide on defending DUI drug cases in Florida.



Strategies to Challenge and Beat DRE Testimony in DUI Cases

Challenging DRE testimony requires a strategic approach. Experienced DUI defense attorneys can file motions to suppress DRE evidence, cross-examine the DRE’s qualifications and methods, and present expert witnesses to counter the DRE’s findings. Understanding the limitations and potential flaws in the DRE protocol is crucial for a successful defense.

Effective Defense Tactics Against DRE Evidence

Defense tactics may include questioning the DRE’s training and experience, highlighting inconsistencies in the DRE protocol, and presenting alternative explanations for the observed signs of impairment. By undermining the credibility of the DRE testimony, attorneys can cast doubt on the prosecution’s case.

What are effective defense tactics against DRE evidence? Effective defense tactics against DRE evidence include questioning the DRE’s training, highlighting inconsistencies in the protocol, and presenting alternative explanations for impairment signs.

Here are some of the most effective strategies:

  1. Questioning DRE Training and Experience: The requirements for DRE certification have been watered down over the years. By scrutinizing the DRE’s credentials, training, and experience, defense attorneys can expose potential gaps in their expertise.
  2. Highlighting Protocol Inconsistencies: The DRE protocol involves a 12-step process that includes observations and physical examinations. Any inconsistencies or deviations from this protocol can be used to challenge the reliability of the DRE’s conclusions.
  3. Presenting Alternative Explanations: Medical conditions, fatigue, and other factors can mimic the signs of drug impairment. By presenting alternative explanations for the observed signs, defense attorneys can cast doubt on the DRE’s findings.
  4. Using Expert Witnesses: Expert witnesses can provide alternative interpretations of the evidence, challenging the DRE’s conclusions and offering explanations that support the defense’s case.

For instance, challenging the validity of field sobriety tests can be an effective strategy. These tests are often a component of the DRE protocol, and any issues with their administration or interpretation can cast doubt on the overall evaluation.

The admissibility of DRE evidence often hinges on legal standards such as the Frye and Daubert tests. Courts may rule that the general portion of the DRE protocol is not scientific, making it easier for defense attorneys to challenge its validity.

Several court cases have addressed the admissibility of DRE evidence, setting important precedents:

  • Williams v. State, 710 So.2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998): This case established that the general portion of the DRE protocol is not considered scientific under Frye, making it easier to challenge its admissibility.
  • Bragg v. State, 644 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994): In this case, the court ruled that certain aspects of the DRE protocol could be admitted as evidence, but emphasized the need for rigorous scrutiny of the DRE’s qualifications and methods.

Understanding these legal precedents is crucial for building a robust defense strategy. By leveraging case law, defense attorneys can effectively challenge the admissibility of DRE evidence and weaken the prosecution’s case.

For more insights on how to challenge DRE evidence, you can explore our detailed guide on excluding drug evidence in Florida DUIs.

Practical Steps for Defense Attorneys

Defense attorneys have several practical steps they can take to challenge DRE evidence:

  1. Filing Motions to Suppress: Attorneys can file pre-trial motions to suppress DRE evidence, arguing that it does not meet the required standards of scientific reliability.
  2. Cross-Examining the DRE: During cross-examination, attorneys can question the DRE’s qualifications, training, and the methods used during the evaluation.
  3. Presenting Expert Witnesses: Expert witnesses can provide alternative interpretations of the evidence, challenging the DRE’s conclusions and offering explanations that support the defense’s case.
  4. Highlighting Protocol Flaws: Any flaws or inconsistencies in the DRE protocol can be used to undermine the credibility of the evidence.

For example, challenging the influence of DRE evaluations on DUI drug prosecutions can be a powerful strategy. By scrutinizing the DRE’s methods and findings, defense attorneys can reveal weaknesses in the prosecution’s case.

By employing these strategies, defense attorneys can effectively challenge DRE evidence and increase the chances of a favorable outcome for their clients.

For more information on how to build a strong defense in DUI drug cases, visit our comprehensive guide on defending DUI drug cases in Florida.

Conclusion

Challenging DRE testimony in DUI cases requires a nuanced and strategic approach. By questioning the DRE’s training, highlighting inconsistencies in the protocol, and presenting alternative explanations for the observed signs of impairment, defense attorneys can effectively undermine the credibility of the DRE evidence. Leveraging legal precedents and expert witnesses further strengthens the defense, increasing the likelihood of a favorable outcome.

For more information on defending against DUI drug charges, explore our detailed guides on the role of expert witnesses and challenging drug test results in DUI cases.


Infographic depicting the words The Role of Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) in Drug DUIs (And How to Beat Them)


What is a Drug Recognition Expert (DRE)?

A Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) is a law enforcement officer trained to identify drug-impaired drivers. The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) certifies DREs, who must complete rigorous training and maintain their certification through regular evaluations and recertification courses.

How does the DRE protocol work?

The DRE protocol is a systematic process used to assess whether a driver is under the influence of drugs. This 12-step evaluation includes a series of tests and observations that help the DRE determine the type of drug causing impairment. The steps range from initial breath alcohol tests to detailed physical examinations.

What are the key components of the DRE protocol?

The DRE protocol includes several critical steps such as measuring pupil size, observing pupil reactions to light, taking blood pressure and pulse rates, and conducting divided attention psychophysical tests. These steps are designed to identify specific drug categories and their effects on the body.

Is DRE evidence admissible in court?

In some cases, DRE evidence is admissible. As a general rule, the courts have found that the Frye test does not apply to DRE evidence because the general portion of the DRE protocol is not scientific. However, the admissibility often hinges on whether it meets the Frye or Daubert standards for scientific evidence.

For more comprehensive information on DUI drug cases, explore our detailed guides on the role of expert witnesses and challenging drug test results in DUI cases.


Explore additional practice areas we serve to understand the full range of our legal expertise:

Florida DUI Drug Defense Guide Urine Tests in DUI Arrests
Expert Witnesses in DUI Drug Cases Defending Adderall DUIs
Marijuana DUI Defense Marijuana DUI Defense Tactics
Excluding Drug Evidence in DUIs Challenging Police Testimony
FSTs in DUI Drug Cases DRE Evaluations in DUI Prosecutions
Drug Testing in DUI Cases Prescription Drugs and DUIs
Challenging Drug Test Results Drugs and DUI Consequences
DUI Drug Cases vs Alcohol DUIs Defending Ketamine DUIs

Top-Rated DUI Lawyers Serving Florida

Looking for the best DUI lawyers in Florida? Our distinguished team of attorneys is committed to offering you the best possible defense against your DUI charges.

  • John Vallillo: As a stalwart in the Florida legal scene, John Vallillo has earned his stripes through a consistent record of case dismissals and proactive defense. His background as both a prosecutor and defense attorney enriches his strategic defense planning with invaluable insights.
  • Joe Easton: Renowned for crafting winning defenses, Joe Easton’s approach to legal advocacy in Florida combines thorough preparation with aggressive representation. His notable recognitions and ratings stand testament to his exceptional service and client-focused approach.
  • Joel Leppard: Joel Leppard infuses every DUI case with a level of personal commitment and innovative thinking that sets him apart. His leadership has not only grown Leppard Law into a top-rated criminal defense law firm but also ensured that clients receive empathetic, effective legal care.

Discover What Our Clients Are Saying

At the forefront of our DUI practice is a deep-seated commitment to client satisfaction. Each case is handled with utmost care, as echoed in the appreciative feedback from those we represent. Stellar reviews are what make us consistently one of Central Florida’s top-rated DUI law firms. This is just a portion of our hundreds of 5-star reviews on Facebook, Google, Thumbtack, Yelp, and more. You can read more 5-star reviews here.








Contact Us Today for Expert DUI Defense

At Leppard Law: DUI Attorneys, we understand the stress and anxiety that come with facing a DUI charge. Our experienced team of attorneys is committed to providing you with the best possible defense, leveraging our extensive legal expertise and dedication to personal attention.

We treat our clients like family, always putting their best interests first and fighting for the most favorable outcomes. But you don’t have to take our word for it—experience it for yourself. If you or a loved one has been charged with a DUI, contact us today to schedule a free consultation.

Call us at 407-476-4111 and let us help you navigate this challenging time with confidence and peace of mind.

Recognized Excellence in DUI Defense

Don’t just take our word for it. Check out some of the prestigious awards and recognitions we’ve received:

Award Granting Organization Year
SuperLawyers “Rising Star” SuperLawyers 2019 – 2020
Awesome Attorneys Orlando Orlando Family Magazine 2019-2023
Best DUI Lawyers in Orlando Expertise 2024
Top 10 DUI Attorneys near Orlando, FL Thumbtack 2024
Martindale Hubbell “Client Champion Platinum” Martindale Hubbell 2018-24

These accolades reflect our unwavering commitment to excellence in DUI defense. When you choose Leppard Law, you’re choosing a firm recognized for its dedication and expertise.

Call 407-476-4111 or contact us online to schedule your free consultation today. Let us provide the support and legal expertise you deserve.

Trusted Content


Legally Reviewed by Joe Easton

Experienced Florida DUI Attorney

Legally reviewed by Joe Easton and the content team, this article on the role of Drug Recognition Experts (DREs) in Drug DUIs reflects the firm’s 60 years of combined criminal defense expertise. Joe Easton, with his extensive experience and strategic prowess in DUI and criminal defense, offers more than just legal representation; he brings a commitment to turning legal challenges into triumphs. His approach, combining tenacity in the courtroom with personalized client care, ensures your DUI case is not just defended but championed with dedication and expertise.

Learn More About Joe Easton