fbpx

Can I change my mind after refusing to blow in Florida? (How to Recant)




Understanding the Implications of Refusing a Breath Test in Florida

Refusing to submit to a breath test during a DUI stop in Florida can lead to serious consequences. The state’s implied consent law mandates that drivers agree to chemical testing if suspected of driving under the influence. However, there are circumstances where you might reconsider your initial refusal. This section explores the legal implications of refusing a breath test and the potential for recanting that refusal.

When you refuse a breath test, you face immediate administrative penalties, including license suspension. Additionally, your refusal can be used as evidence against you in court. Understanding these consequences is crucial for making an informed decision.

Florida’s implied consent law requires drivers to submit to chemical tests, such as breath, blood, or urine tests, if lawfully arrested for a DUI. Refusing to take these tests can result in a one-year license suspension for a first offense and an 18-month suspension for subsequent refusals. Additionally, refusal can lead to enhanced penalties if convicted of a DUI.

It’s important to note that the refusal itself can be used as evidence of guilt in court. Prosecutors often argue that refusal indicates consciousness of guilt, which can sway a jury or judge. Therefore, understanding the legal ramifications of refusing a breath test is essential for any driver facing a DUI stop.

What is the implied consent law? The implied consent law in Florida requires drivers to submit to chemical testing if suspected of DUI. Refusal can lead to license suspension and other penalties.

Refusing a breath test can complicate your defense strategy. However, there are scenarios where recanting your refusal may be possible, potentially mitigating some of the legal consequences. For more detailed guidance, consult with an experienced DUI defense attorney who can navigate these complex legal waters on your behalf. Understanding your rights and the implications of your actions can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case.

Can I change my mind after refusing to blow in Florida? (How to Recant)

Can you change your mind after initially refusing to blow in Florida? The answer is yes, under certain conditions. Recanting your refusal can potentially mitigate some of the legal ramifications. This section delves into the specific legal grounds and procedures for recanting a refusal in Florida.

Conditions for Recanting

To successfully recant a refusal, several conditions must be met:

  • Reasonable Time Frame: The request to take the chemical test must be made within a reasonable time after the initial refusal.
  • Accuracy of the Test: The test must still be accurate, and the testing equipment must be readily available.
  • No Substantial Inconvenience: There should be no substantial inconvenience or additional expense to the police.
  • Continuous Custody: The defendant must have been in continuous custody and under observation.

These conditions ensure that the integrity of the test results is maintained and that the law enforcement process is not unduly disrupted. If these criteria are met, your criminal defense attorney can file a motion to suppress any evidence of the initial refusal. This could lead to the prosecutor dropping the charges against you or at least reducing the case to a less serious charge, such as reckless driving.

What happens if you refuse to take the chemical test after a DUI arrest but then change your mind? Your criminal defense attorney can file and litigate a motion to suppress any evidence of the refusal to submit to chemical testing.

Florida courts have established legal precedents that allow for the recantation of a DUI refusal under specific conditions. One landmark case is Larmer v. Dept of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, 522 So.2d 941 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). In this case, the court looked to decisions in other states and found that recanting a refusal should be allowed if it does not compromise the accuracy of the test or cause substantial inconvenience to the police.

For instance, in State v. Moore, 62 Haw. 301, 614 P.2d 931 (1980), Hawaii adopted a rule permitting the withdrawal of an initial refusal. The court in Hawaii rejected any “rule of law which would rigidly and unreasonably bind an arrested person to his first words spoken, no matter how quickly and under what circumstances those words are withdrawn.” This case emphasized the importance of fairness and practicalities in administering chemical tests.

Public policy considerations also support a more flexible rule for DUI refusals. Allowing recantations makes important evidence gathered after a breath test more frequently available, thereby supporting the prophylactic purpose of the implied consent laws. This approach ensures that the evidence used in court is as accurate and reliable as possible.

Practical Steps to Recant a Refusal

Recanting a refusal is not just a legal maneuver; it involves practical steps and considerations. Knowing what to do and when to act can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. Here are the steps to follow if you wish to recant your refusal:

  • Inform the Arresting Officer: As soon as you decide to take the test, inform the arresting officer of your decision.
  • Verify Test Availability: Ensure that the testing equipment is still available and that the test can be administered accurately.
  • Consult a Criminal Defense Attorney: Your attorney can file a motion to suppress the initial refusal and guide you through the legal process.
  • Demonstrate No Substantial Inconvenience: Be prepared to show that your recantation did not cause substantial inconvenience or additional expense to the police.

By following these steps, you can improve your chances of successfully recanting your refusal and potentially mitigating the legal consequences. For more information on the legal intricacies of DUI cases, check out our Florida DUI Refusal Guide.

What are the conditions for recanting a DUI refusal in Florida? The request must be made within a reasonable time, the test must still be accurate, there should be no substantial inconvenience to the police, and the defendant must have been in continuous custody.

Understanding the legal grounds and procedures for recanting a refusal can be complex. Consulting with an experienced DUI defense attorney can provide you with the guidance and representation you need to navigate this challenging situation.

Public Policy and Judicial Precedents on Recanting DUI Refusals

Florida courts have looked to other states for guidance on the issue of recanting DUI refusals. Judicial precedents and public policy considerations play a significant role in shaping the rules around this issue. This section examines key court cases and the public policy behind allowing recantations.

Key Court Cases

In Larmer v. Dept of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, the court allowed recantation under specific conditions. This case set a precedent in Florida for allowing individuals to change their minds about refusing a chemical test, provided certain criteria are met. The court emphasized that the request to take the test must be made within a reasonable time, the test must still be accurate, and there should be no substantial inconvenience or additional expense to the police.

Similarly, in State v. Moore, Hawaii adopted a rule permitting the withdrawal of an initial refusal. The court in Hawaii found that an arrested person should not be rigidly bound to their first words spoken, especially if those words are withdrawn quickly and under reconsideration. This decision underscored the importance of fairness and practicalities in administering chemical tests.

What is the significance of Larmer v. Dept of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles? This case set a precedent in Florida for allowing individuals to recant their refusal to take a chemical test under specific conditions, emphasizing fairness and practicalities.

Another noteworthy case is DHSMV v. Satter, where the court found that a conditional and equivocal recantation would not be deemed a “recantation” under Larmer. This case highlighted the importance of a clear and unequivocal decision to take the test after an initial refusal.

In State v. Eng, the trial court found that the defendant initially refused to take the chemical test but then agreed to take it shortly after, while still in continuous custody and under observation. The court ruled that there was no substantial inconvenience to the police, allowing the recantation to be valid. This case further reinforced the criteria established in Larmer.

Public Policy Behind a More Flexible Rule for DUI Refusals

The public policy behind allowing recantations of DUI refusals is rooted in fairness and the practicalities of administering chemical tests. In Larmer, the court looked to decisions in other states and found that a more flexible rule would better serve the purpose of the implied consent laws. For instance, the court cited Lund v. Hjelle, where it was found that a reasonable delay in administering the test would not frustrate the legislative intent behind the implied consent laws.

In State v. Moore, the court rejected any rigid rule that would bind an arrested person to their initial refusal, emphasizing that fairness to all parties should be considered. This approach ensures that important evidence gathered after a breath test is more frequently available, supporting the prophylactic purpose of the implied consent laws.

What is the public policy behind allowing recantations of DUI refusals? The policy is rooted in fairness and practicalities, ensuring that important evidence gathered after a breath test is more frequently available and supporting the purpose of implied consent laws.

As a matter of good public policy, a more flexible rule makes important evidence gathered after a breath test more frequently available, thereby supporting the prophylactic purpose of the implied consent laws. This approach ensures that the evidence used in court is as accurate and reliable as possible, ultimately serving the interests of justice.

For more detailed information on the legal intricacies of DUI refusals, you can explore our Florida DUI Refusal Guide. Understanding the judicial precedents and public policy behind recantations can provide valuable insights into your case and help you make informed decisions.

It’s crucial to consult with an experienced DUI defense attorney who can navigate the complexities of recanting a refusal and provide you with the best legal representation. By understanding the key court cases and public policy considerations, you can better appreciate the nuances of this legal issue and take the necessary steps to protect your rights.


Practical Considerations and Steps to Recant a Refusal

Recanting a refusal is not just a legal maneuver; it involves practical steps and considerations. Knowing what to do and when to act can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. This section provides a step-by-step guide on how to recant a refusal and the practical considerations involved.

Steps to Recant

Can I change my mind after refusing to blow in Florida? (How to Recant)

Here are the steps to follow if you wish to recant your refusal:

  • Inform the arresting officer: Notify the arresting officer of your decision to take the test as soon as possible. Timing is crucial, as the request must be made within a reasonable time after the initial refusal.
  • Ensure equipment availability: Confirm that the testing equipment is still available and that the test can be administered accurately. The accuracy of the test is essential for it to be considered valid.
  • Consult with a criminal defense attorney: Seek legal advice immediately. An experienced attorney can file a motion to suppress any evidence of the initial refusal, which might cause the prosecutor to drop the charges or reduce them to a less serious offense such as reckless driving.
  • Demonstrate no substantial inconvenience: Be prepared to show that your recantation did not cause substantial inconvenience or additional expense to the police. This can be a critical factor in the court’s decision.

Practical Considerations

Recanting a refusal involves several practical considerations that can impact the success of your case:

  • Timing: The request to take the chemical test must be made within a reasonable time after the initial refusal. Courts have generally found that a reasonable delay does not frustrate the legislative intent behind the implied consent laws.
  • Continuous custody: You must have been in continuous custody and under observation. This ensures that there has been no opportunity for tampering or contamination that could affect the test results.
  • Accurate testing: The test must still be accurate, and the testing equipment or facilities must be readily available. This helps to ensure that the evidence gathered is reliable and can be used in court.
  • Legal representation: Having a skilled DUI defense attorney can make a significant difference. Your attorney can navigate the complexities of recanting a refusal and provide you with the best legal representation.

Several legal precedents support the recantation of a DUI refusal under specific conditions:

  • In Larmer v. Dept of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles, the court allowed recantation if the request to take the chemical test was made within a reasonable time, the test would still be accurate, and there was no substantial inconvenience or additional expense to the police.
  • In State v. Moore, the court found that an initial refusal to be tested could be withdrawn and rescinded, emphasizing fairness and practical considerations.
  • In State v. Eng, the court ruled that there was no substantial inconvenience to the police when the defendant agreed to take the test shortly after the initial refusal.

What are the conditions for recanting a DUI refusal? The request to take the chemical test must be made within a reasonable time after the initial refusal, the test must still be accurate, the testing equipment must be available, and there should be no substantial inconvenience to the police.

Understanding these legal precedents can provide valuable insights into your case and help you make informed decisions. For a comprehensive overview, refer to our Florida DUI Refusal Guide.

Potential Outcomes of Recanting a Refusal

Recanting a refusal can lead to various outcomes, depending on the circumstances of your case:

  • Suppression of refusal evidence: Your attorney can file a motion to suppress any evidence of the initial refusal. If successful, this can weaken the prosecution’s case significantly.
  • Reduced charges: The prosecutor might drop the DUI charges or reduce them to a less serious offense, such as reckless driving, if the motion to suppress is granted.
  • License reinstatement: Successfully recanting a refusal can also impact administrative penalties, such as license suspension. You might be eligible for a restricted license or even full reinstatement.

If you have refused a breath test and are considering recanting your refusal, it is crucial to act quickly and consult with an experienced attorney. The team at Leppard Law: DUI Lawyers can guide you through the process and help you achieve the best possible outcome for your case.


Infographic depicting the words Can I change my mind after refusing to blow in Florida? (How to Recant)


Can I change my mind after refusing a breath test in Florida?

Yes, under certain conditions, you can change your mind after refusing a breath test in Florida. The request to take the chemical test must be made within a reasonable time after the initial refusal, the test must still be accurate, the testing equipment must be available, and there should be no substantial inconvenience to the police.

What are the legal consequences of refusing a breath test in Florida?

The legal consequences of refusing a breath test in Florida include immediate administrative penalties such as license suspension. Additionally, your refusal can be used as evidence against you in court, potentially leading to harsher penalties if convicted of DUI.

How can recanting a refusal affect my DUI case?

Recanting a refusal can potentially mitigate some of the legal ramifications of a DUI case. If the conditions for recanting are met, your attorney can file a motion to suppress the initial refusal, which might lead to reduced charges or even dismissal of the case.

What steps should I take to recant my refusal?

To recant your refusal, you should:

  1. Inform the arresting officer: Notify the arresting officer of your decision to take the test as soon as possible.
  2. Ensure equipment availability: Confirm that the testing equipment is still available and that the test can be administered accurately.
  3. Consult with an attorney: Seek legal advice immediately to file a motion to suppress the initial refusal.
  4. Demonstrate no substantial inconvenience: Be prepared to show that your recantation did not cause substantial inconvenience or additional expense to the police.







Can I Change My Mind After Refusing to Blow in Florida? (How to Recant)

Explore additional practice areas and related pages that might be relevant to your case:

Florida DUI Refusal Guide Confusion Doctrine in DUI
Restricted Licenses After DUI Refusal Second DUI Refusal
Florida’s Implied Consent Law Refusing DUI Breath Test
Defending DUI Refusal Case DUI Charges After Refusal
DUI Refusal and Insurance Rates Beating DUI Refusal Charges
Bashful Kidney Defense DUI Breath Testing Essentials
Intoxilyzer 8000 Calibration Intoxilyzer 8000 Setup
Intoxilyzer 8000 Errors Interferent Detect Errors

Top-Rated DUI Lawyers Serving Florida

Looking for the best DUI lawyers in Florida? Our distinguished team of attorneys is committed to offering you the best possible defense against your DUI charges.

  • John Vallillo: As a stalwart in the Florida legal scene, John Vallillo has earned his stripes through a consistent record of case dismissals and proactive defense. His background as both a prosecutor and defense attorney enriches his strategic defense planning with invaluable insights.
  • Joe Easton: Renowned for crafting winning defenses, Joe Easton’s approach to legal advocacy in Florida combines thorough preparation with aggressive representation. His notable recognitions and ratings stand testament to his exceptional service and client-focused approach.
  • Joel Leppard: Joel Leppard infuses every DUI case with a level of personal commitment and innovative thinking that sets him apart. His leadership has not only grown Leppard Law into a top-rated criminal defense law firm but also ensured that clients receive empathetic, effective legal care.

Discover What Our Clients Are Saying

At the forefront of our DUI practice is a deep-seated commitment to client satisfaction. Each case is handled with utmost care, as echoed in the appreciative feedback from those we represent. Stellar reviews are what make us one of Central Florida’s top-rated DUI law firms. You can read more 5-star reviews here.















Can I Change My Mind After Refusing to Blow in Florida? (How to Recant)

Take Control of Your DUI Case Today

Dealing with a DUI charge can be overwhelming, but you don’t have to face it alone. At Leppard Law, we understand the stress and uncertainty that comes with such charges. Our team of experienced DUI attorneys is here to provide you with the best possible defense and support.

What does it look like to have a personal relationship with your attorney? Someone who has your back when things get tough? A lawyer that knows you as well as they know your case? At Leppard Law, we treat our clients like family. We always put their best interests first and fight for the best possible outcome for their case.

But you don’t have to take our word for it – experience it for yourself. If you or a loved one have been charged with a DUI or any other criminal offense, contact us today to schedule a free consultation. 407-476-4111

Our firm has been recognized for our dedication and excellence in criminal defense:

Our commitment to excellence has earned us numerous accolades, but our true measure of success is the satisfaction and peace of mind of our clients. We encourage you to read our numerous, enthusiastic, five-star reviews on Google, Thumbtack, Avvo, Yelp, and Facebook.

At Leppard Law, we are not happy unless you are completely happy with our services. Our experienced criminal lawyers provide the same resources available from larger firms but are known for our unique dedication to personal attention.

Don’t wait. Rest easy and pick up the phone. We’re here to help! 407-476-4111


Trusted Content


Legally Reviewed by Joe Easton

Experienced Florida DUI Attorney

Legally reviewed by Joe Easton and the content team, this article reflects the firm’s 60 years of combined criminal defense expertise. Joe Easton, with his extensive experience and strategic prowess in DUI and criminal defense, offers more than just legal representation; he brings a commitment to turning legal challenges into triumphs. His approach, combining tenacity in the courtroom with personalized client care, ensures your DUI case is not just defended but championed with dedication and expertise.

Learn More About Joe Easton